मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Mars One: An Indian Astronaut, Not Chinese, Delivers a Baby on Her Way to Mars

James Lovegrove: 

“…Contrary to received opinion, science fiction’s preoccupation has always been the here and now. Its far-flung planets and future timelines are merely a way to analyse the contemporary. In this respect, it is the most politically engaged of all literary genres. Motifs that may appear trashy to the uninitiated - space exploration, extraterrestrials, futuristic technology - can in fact be surprisingly sophisticated tools for dissecting and examining the world as it is…"


(FT, February 9 2007)


Laurie Penny asks in New Statesman, April 30 2013  "Modern life is science fiction – but would you dare go on a one-way mission to Mars?" and explains:


"If you were offered a one-way ticket to Mars, would you take it? It’s a serious question. The first manned Mars landing, organised by a Dutch company called Mars One, has put out a call for applicants. In 2018, the planets will literally align, making a journey to the Red Planet more than feasible. You don’t have to be a trained astronaut but you must be willing to spend 521 days in a very small space with three other people, with limited supplies and drinking water reclaimed from your own effluvia. You will also be under constant video surveillance, because this mission to Mars is relying on global TV networks to cover its considerable budget. It’s the ultimate Big Brother, with no way out: after a year and a half the colonists will either shag or kill each other, or both. The ratings will be fantastic.
Most of all, you must be willing to say goodbye for ever to your family, your friends, the barista at your favourite coffee shop. This is a one-way trip: even if they make it through the gruelling physical ordeal of the journey, it is possible none of the astronauts will ever come home."

This is the reality of  man's mission to Mars...possibly in year 2018, non-Governmental project, 521 days journey, one way ticket, funded by reality TV..."a very small space with three other people"...Could you imagine a woman delivering a baby in such an environment?

On learning that about 600 Chinese have lined up to travel on Mars One, Marathi daily Loksatta, on May 4 2013,  felt worried sick that 'colonizers' Chinese were now going to invade Mars (after recently 'invading' India)! The paper also felt that China had now become 'Mars' in Indian nation's horoscope.

I have not a read a lot of science fiction. In Marathi, I have not read almost any beyond Jayant Narlikar (जयंत नारळीकर)  and Narayan Dharap (नारायण धारप).

The other day,  I read the late D B Mokashi's (दि बा मोकाशी) science fiction short story 'Sharavati' ('शरावती) first published in Diwali 1963, almost 50 years ago. 1963 is the year of John F. Kennedy assassination, Vietnam war...Cuban Missile Crisis and India-China war were just a year old that Diwali

I like a lot of what Mr. Mokashi has written. This story too is interesting but can't be called one of his best and, another thing,  he can't really write about politics. His praise for Indian civilization and nation- unnecessary for the story line-  is not just jarring and but not even entirely factual. (Is it prompted by India's crushing defeat by China towards the end of 1962?)

Mokashi imagines that an Indian woman astronaut 'Sharavati' is travelling to Mars in year 1980 and soon after the journey begins discovers that she is pregnant!

How did she get pregnant? During a break in her training for the Mars mission, she meets her husband alone as their kids are away.

Eventually, she delivers a baby boy in space- apparently with less trouble because of zero gravity-  and returns to earth successfully as her mission is aborted by its possible collision with an asteroid. (Today, Mokashi would have been advised not to bring Sharavati and her kid back to the earth but instead make them colonize Mars by reaching there!)

I have already quoted David Graeber earlier on this blog:

"As someone who was eight years old at the time of the Apollo moon landing, I remember calculating that I would be thirty-nine in the magic year 2000 and wondering what the world would be like. Did I expect I would be living in such a world of wonders? Of course. Everyone did. Do I feel cheated now? It seemed unlikely that I’d live to see all the things I was reading about in science fiction, but it never occurred to me that I wouldn’t see any of them."

Manned Mars mission is one of "any of them".

Cory Doctorow has said : "science fiction writers don't predict the future (except accidentally), but if they're very good, they may manage to predict the present.

Although unwanted pregnancies were of immediate concern in 1963, Mokashi is certainly onto something bigger than that in his story. At the end of the story, I got a feeling that it was steeped in feminist ideology. And I think that is where Mokashi succeeds and predicts the future: 2013.

Mokashi imagines J L Nehru c 1980 to be not just alive but riding a horse and giving interviews on the subject of Sharavati's predicament. We know Nehru died in 1964 but it's interesting to see how the generation of Mokashi could not quite contemplate Nehru's death just an year earlier. 

Mokashi imagines a kind of media frenzy we see today. But he hands out a certificate of good conduct to Indian journalists vis-a-vis their foreign counterparts.  Surprisingly,  he doesn't imagine TV in India in 1980 and he is right because TV went on rampage in India only after 1982.

 Mokashi tells us a little about the world politics of 1980. World has seen WW III in 1965 and is on the brink of WW IV in 1980.   

Mokashi's world of 1980 is quadripolar: Yellow skinned (पीतवर्णीय), America+Russia+Europe, all of Asia,  and Negroes. He sees the world divided on the lines of racial schisms and not economic / ideological ones. (I was confused by just one thing how yellow skinned and all of Asia are two exclusive groupings? Isn't Asia = yellow+brown+ some white?)

That's quite a bold prediction  considering how powerful Russian block was in 1963. Therefore, not only Mokashi sees the fall of Soviet Union and demise of communism but predicts America and Russia coming together. It's also interesting to note how race was going to prevail over other things in his future. (If we consider India, we know how caste, religion and language have prevailed over economic and other factors.)

Mokashi says we may think of this state of world politics as barbaric in 2001. On the contrary,  we all think this to be normal.  

Towards the end, Mokashi tells us that thanks to 'Sharavati pregnancy' episode, humans end up colonizing Mars in 1980 and those colonies now are thriving in year 2001. 

If so, the following should not surprise us. 


In January 2008, there was a report in Daily Mail of UK:

“The photo of what looks like a naked woman with her arm outstretched was among several taken on the red planet and sent back to Earth by NASA's Mars explorer Spirit.”

I am just worried about one thing: Is she Chinese and of child-bearing age and, if so, will she mate only with another Chinese?



courtesy: Barcroft Media and Daily Mail, UK